![]()
![]()
Everyone's a publisher
![]()
By Clive Shepherd
A healthy intranet is one in which all members of an
organisation are able to contribute to the content, to become publishers as well as
readers. But preparing content for the screen is not the same as working on paper - it has
its own rules, grammar, vocabulary, constraints and possibilities. In this article, Clive
Shepherd argues that we will not extract anything like the maximum benefit from our
intranets if we dont teach our new breed of publishers the language of the web.
Contents
![]()
History
repeating itself
Working on screen is different
Creating quality intranet content
Training to be a publisher
History repeating itself
![]()
Unfortunately, history has a habit of repeating itself. All too
often we mislead ourselves into believing that if we supply our employees with the very
best tools, that by some magic they will know, not only how to use them, but when, where
and why. Did having a phone ever make anyone more able to deal effectively with customers?
Did word processing software teach you how to lay out documents professionally? Did
desk-top publishing software sound the death knells for the graphic design industry? And
did PowerPoint ever guarantee a good presentation? Please add your own examples. I can
hear the groans from here.
So, does a copy of Microsoft FrontPage (or whatever other package you may be using) provide you with the skills you need to become a web page author, a publisher for the screen? No, of course not.
You may say, well, Ive been taught how to use FrontPage, so Im alright. And its true that youre at an advantage in that you know what buttons to press, how to insert a clip art animation, how to pepper the screen with fonts, how to select a bright coloured, textured background and even how to convert your 100-page Word document directly into HTML. In short, you have all the skills necessary to become a liability within your organisation, to kill the intranet stone dead and to maximise sales of aspirin.
Of course, when I say you, I dont really mean you. After all, youre a communications professional and you know that it takes a great deal of skill and experience to get your message across. Im talking about the hundreds, if not thousands, of employees in your organisation who have suddenly added on-line publisher to their job descriptions. Because, with the intranet, everyones a publisher.
As a starting point, here is a brief description of what are
probably the most popular methods for business communication used today. Some of these are
universally familiar, others recent arrivals on the scene, but for completeness and to
ensure a common understanding, I have attempted to describe them all.
![]()
![]()
But go much beyond these and you are looking at two very different environments:
Do these physical differences between the two media really matter? You bet. They matter because if you ignore them and just copy your working practices from paper to the screen, then your documents will most likely be unreadable, disorientating, dull and so big that they jam up your network.
We also know, from research conducted by Sun Microsystems, that people behave differently when reading from a screen:
As a result, they recommend that web documents should contain
only 50% as much content as their paper equivalents. They also recommend a completely
different approach to designing for the screen.
![]()
![]()
Creating content that counts
![]()
Content is king. Of all the goals, content comes first, because
without it, the rest are academic. 'Content that counts' is content that meets an
identified audience need. It's accurate, up-to-date, relevant and on time. It's pitched at
the right level and uses the right language for your audience. It contains all the
necessary information, but only as much as is absolutely necessary.
On-line publishers need to know:
Making your pages easy to find
![]()
However good your content, your efforts will have been entirely
in vain if your audience can not find it. It may seem easy to bring readers and documents
together, but on screen all content is invisible until you find it - unlike the more
obvious physical presence of paper.
On-line publishers need to know:
Getting the readers attention
![]()
You've got great content. The user has even found your page
amongst all the available options on your intranet. What are your chances of holding the
user long enough to read what you've got to say? Not great, if you can't grab their
attention.
On-line publishers need to know:
Keeping the reader orientated
![]()
Once you've got your reader's attention, you need to maintain it
as they try to find the information they need. It is much easier on screen than it is on
paper for a reader to become lost or disorientated. Fortunately, with good design these
problems can be avoided.
On-line publishers need to know:
Ensuring readability
![]()
We know that users find it slower to read off screen than off
paper. For that reason we need to do all we can to make our web pages as readable as
possible. Often designs that work well on paper are applied to the screen without
consideration for the obvious differences. Worse, many web pages employ designs that would
not work on any medium.
On-line publishers need to know:
Making your pages easy to skim
![]()
Readers skim web pages rather than reading them word-for-word.
Your job is not to work against this phenomenon but to make it easier. With a commercial
web site, it is in your interest to hold the user at your site long enough to sell them
something. On an intranet, you have a different goal: to provide the user with the
information they want as quickly as possible. And to do this, the user must be able to
move through your material easily.
On-line publishers need to know:
Providing connectivity
![]()
Connections create the web. Without connections, the spider
would have nowhere to travel. With a variety of links, you can provide the user with all
the advantages of on-screen reading.
On-line publishers need to know:
Training to be a publisher
![]()
We now know what information has to be conveyed to on-line
publishers, but what methods should we use to achieve the training? Well, there are three
principal ways of meeting any training need classroom training, self-study and
on-job training. And all three have a part to play in providing on-line publishers with
the skills they require:
Classroom training
| Pros Learners have the opportunity to interact directly with a subject matter expert Learners get away from job distractions Learners make contact with other intranet authors |
Cons There can be a wide variability in the prior knowledge and experience of learners The training is not always available when and where it is needed |
Self-study
Self-study has it own unique pros and cons:
| Pros The learning is self-paced, so differences between learners are of less significance Learners can access the training at a time and place that suits their needs Self-study can deliver results speedily and inexpensively |
Cons Some learners may feel the need for a greater level of direct support Learners are denied the opportunity of learning from each other Not everyone has the self-discipline required for self-study |
On-job training
![]()
Learning on the job is usually derided as being no more than
sitting next to Nellie, which is unfair on many Nellies out there, some of
whom are not such bad trainers. It is true that much on-job training is unstructured,
inefficient and passes on bad habits, but well trained instructors, mentors and coaches
provide an invaluable service in the workplace.
| Pros Learners can obtain a personal service, where the training is tailored to meet their needs Learners obtain personalised feedback The learning takes place in a familiar environment |
Cons One-to-one training is much more expensive than other methods Can be poorly structured Instructors need subject matter expertise and training skills |
A three pronged approach
![]()
Of course, many organisations make available a variety of
training methods to suit the learning styles and preferences of individual learners. It is
possible to envisage a course for on-line publishers that uses all three methods at
different stages; what I call the trident, or three-pronged approach:
Whichever method you choose, there are significant benefits to be achieved from the skilled application of web page design principles. In two studies at Sun Microsystems, measured usability was improved by 159% and 124% by rewriting content to conform to best practice guidelines.
History does not have to repeat itself. We can do much more
than provide our on-line publishers with the tools of the trade, we can help them to learn
from the experience of the thousands of web page designers that have preceded them. We can
provide them with the knowledge, understanding and skills needed to create quality
intranet content.
![]()
![]()
| © Fastrak Consulting Ltd, 1998 | All rights reserved |